Finally a W3C WG Chair with balls

hixie tries sum flaming BS on janina sajka

janina sedz:

We laid out our timeline, which I may add is far more generous than process requires. Once again, we did not say "ignore." You did. The assertion that that our phrase, "only as time allows," is "another way of saying" ignore is your equivocation. Similarly, the desires and intentions you ascribe to us:_not_ want[ing] to respond to feedback," "actively announc[ing] that [we] intend to ignore substantial feedback," and our supposed "intent to violate W3C process" are all your conjectures. ...

hixie sedz:

However, this is to me merely an academic concern and not one that I believe in any way affects me. I am not personally worried about this.

janina replize

Whether academic or personal, you brought them up and continue to defend them. I believe it is most proper for me to point out that these are your inferences and your conjectures. If you believe you know what we in PF may "want," or "intend," then it is surely reasonable to expect you to have the courage of your convictions, and the intellectual honesty to own them and own up to them as your own.

Surely, most reasonable people would not expect me to leave such inflamatory assertions unchallenged, especially when you declaim them first in public fora? What's the point of that? If you actually believe this stuff, why didn't you first write me personally about it?

mrs last week sez: note to the W3C HTML WG chairs (and don't forget billyjackass): while you dickless wonders continually fall over each for the privilege of giving hixie a reacharound , us sisters are callin' bullshit on hixie, straight up!