maciej sez:
While "Uniform Browser Behavior for the Web" is not quite in that category, it is suggested with the intent of denying that the spec is a proper spec for HTML version 5.
sam sez:
Please refrain from inferring less-than-honorable intents and proposing strawman.
maciej sez:read it
> If you think there are contradictions that are problematic, should they > not be addressed as technical issues in their own right, rather than > playing games around with the title?
sam sez:
I do *NOT* like the characterization of "playing games". Please stop that.
maciej sez:
> If I didn't know any better, I'd think you were just looking for a > pressure point to push for other changes to the spec.
sam sez:
Stop that. Now. I do not know how to say that any more clearly. This behavior is unacceptable.
John dowdell and matt may: adobes anti-HTML5 trolls
hsivonen: seems like jd considers the variability of HTML runtimes a problem, so I guess HTML5 should err on the side off well-defined behavior
othermaciej: oh you're quoting the Adobe trollblogger?
hsivonen: othermaciej: I'm quoting the Adobe Flash blogger who seems to blog a lot about HTML these days
MikeSmith: johnny one-note
othermacie: hsivonen: after reading some of his recent posts, I stand by my prior assertion
othermaciej: yeah, he's basically Adobe's Asa Dotzler
MikeSmith: another possible competitor in this race -
MikeSmith: http://twitter.com/mattmay/status/1884053829
MikeSmith: but I think he'll need to try harder than that if he really wants to win it
othermaciej: it makes Adobe look sad and desparate to try to fight against HTML having more features
read it
Posts
2 comments:
Thanks for the heads-up on that off-venue convo to some of my recent questions.... ;-)
jd/adobe
that's what mr last week is here for.
Post a Comment